12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
3
18
10
4
6
Beste positie
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
1.3
6.1
6.0
3.3
4.7
Laatste test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
23
47
109
40
146

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Droog
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Soelaas
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kosten
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store