12 Shops · 123,162+ Products
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Vredestein ULTRAC Premie
VredesteinVredestein

ULTRAC

1.6
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premie
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
Pilot Sport 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Cinturato P7 C2

Test profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
26
10
—
18
Best position
#1
#2
—
#1
Average position
2.2
6.0
—
6.1
Laatste test
2026
2026
—
2024
Beschikbare maten
66
104
—
47

Prestatievergelijking

Gemiddeld uit 2 tests

Natte prestaties
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
48%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
58%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Vredestein ULTRAC
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Vredestein ULTRAC
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Droge prestaties
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
51%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
32%
Comfort & geluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
74%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Exterieurgeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Interieurgeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Economie
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
42%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Vredestein ULTRAC
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
AutobildAutobild
De zomer
2024205/55 R16Bekijk
ADACADAC
De zomer
2024215/55 R17Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking