12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 6Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.1
R15 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Aantal tests
28
10
4
36
Beste positie
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
2.3
6.0
3.3
3.1
Laatste test
2026
2026
2026
2023
Beschikbare maten
68
109
40
303

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Natte zijgeleiding
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Droog
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Prijs/waarde
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Inwendig geluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenBeste handling bandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Vergelijk ook

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Bladeren op merk

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store