12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Aantal tests
28
18
14
5
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
2.3
6.1
3.6
4.4
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
68
47
194
99

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
74%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
92%
Natte zijgeleiding
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Droog
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
80%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
70%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Prijs/waarde
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
72%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Inwendig geluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store