12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
28
21
24
5
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
2.3
11.9
2.7
2.8
Laatste test
2026
2024
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
68
165
302
139

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droog
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Prijs/waarde
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Inwendig geluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store