12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Aantal tests
28
14
18
15
Beste positie
#1
#1
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
2.3
3.6
6.1
9.0
Laatste test
2026
2025
2024
2025
Beschikbare maten
68
194
47
226

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Natte zijgeleiding
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Droog
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Prijs/waarde
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Inwendig geluid
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store