Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premie

Continental

PremiumContact 6

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

PremiumContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

Aantal tests

36

2

—

1

Best position

#1

#9

—

#1

Average position

3.1

9.0

—

1.0

Laatste test

2023

—

2025

Beschikbare maten

296

64

123

64

Nat

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Continental PremiumContact 6

68%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte zijgeleiding

Continental PremiumContact 6

74%

Droog

Continental PremiumContact 6

90%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droogremmen

Continental PremiumContact 6

92%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

Continental PremiumContact 6

92%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droog rijgedrag

Continental PremiumContact 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

Droge stuurrespons

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Continental PremiumContact 6

95%

Soelaas

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Buitengeluid

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

56%

Inwendig geluid

Continental PremiumContact 6

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Offroad

Continental PremiumContact 6

76%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Kosten

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolweerstand

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

Continental PremiumContact 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Continental PremiumContact 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

PremiumContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

Efficientgrip SUV

ION Evo

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Offroad

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking