12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
36
6
4
5
Beste positie
#1
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.1
4.7
3.3
2.8
Laatste test
2023
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
303
146
40
139

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Natte zijgeleiding
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droog
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Droog rijgedrag
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Inwendig geluid
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometrage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Prijs/waarde
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store