12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
2
10
3
Beste positie
#5
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
6.0
3.3
Laatste test
2021
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
74
104
40

Nat

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Droog

Droog
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking