12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Continental
PremiumContact 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
2
3
10
Beste positie
#5
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.0
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
2021
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
74
40
104

Nat

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Droog

Droog
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Droge behandeling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Droogremmen
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolweerstand
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking