Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

Premie

Continental

PremiumContact 5

R14 – R17

VS

Premie

Goodyear

Also compare with

Turanza T005

PremiumContact 6

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

PremiumContact 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

WetProof

Aantal tests

2

18

13

14

Best position

#5

#1

#2

#8

#1

Average position

6.0

6.1

6.2

13.4

5.6

Laatste test

2021

2024

2026

2023

Beschikbare maten

74

47

530

153

47

Nat

Continental PremiumContact 5

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nokian WetProof

84%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Continental PremiumContact 5

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Nokian WetProof

85%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Continental PremiumContact 5

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Nokian WetProof

72%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Continental PremiumContact 5

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Natte zijgeleiding

Continental PremiumContact 5

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Nokian WetProof

89%

Droog

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Nokian WetProof

78%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Continental PremiumContact 5

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Nokian WetProof

81%

Droogremmen

Continental PremiumContact 5

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Nokian WetProof

87%

Droge behandeling

Continental PremiumContact 5

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Nokian WetProof

80%

Soelaas

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Nokian WetProof

79%

Buitengeluid

Continental PremiumContact 5

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Nokian WetProof

86%

Soelaas

Continental PremiumContact 5

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Nokian WetProof

53%

Kosten

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Nokian WetProof

60%

Rolweerstand

Continental PremiumContact 5

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Nokian WetProof

61%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof

PremiumContact 5

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

Advantage

WetProof

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking