12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
5
10
4
6
3
4
Beste positie
#7
#2
#2
#3
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
6.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
3.3
Laatste test
2022
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
680
109
40
146
36
40

Nat

Nat
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%

Droog

Droog
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometrage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolweerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking