12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
5
10
6
Beste positie
#7
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
6.0
4.7
Laatste test
2022
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
676
104
146

Nat

Nat
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Droog

Droog
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolweerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking