Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premie

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

Premie

GoodYear

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

EcoContact 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Aantal tests

5

23

2

3

5

Beste positie

#7

#1

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

13.0

3.3

1.5

3.7

2.2

Laatste test

2022

2025

Beschikbare maten

676

176

65

34

63

Nat

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Droog

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Droogremmen

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Droge behandeling

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Continental EcoContact 6

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Soelaas

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Buitengeluid

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Soelaas

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Inwendig geluid

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometrage

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Rolweerstand

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Prijs/waarde

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

EcoContact 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Winter

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking