12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Continental
EcoContact 6
Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
5
5
6
Beste positie
#7
#1
#3
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
2.0
4.7
Laatste test
2022
2018
2026
Beschikbare maten
676
146

Nat

Nat
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Droog

Droog
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking