12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Testprofiel

Continental
EcoContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Aantal tests
5
6
3
2
Beste positie
#7
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
4.7
3.7
1.5
Laatste test
2022
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
680
146
36
66

Nat

Nat
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%

Droog

Droog
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Droogremmen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Droge behandeling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Buitengeluid
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Kilometrage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Rolweerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking