12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Continental
EcoContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
5
3
6
4
28
Beste positie
#7
#2
#3
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
3.7
4.7
3.3
2.3
Laatste test
2022
2025
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
680
36
146
40
67

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Droog
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Soelaas
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Inwendig geluid
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometrage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolweerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Prijs/waarde
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store