12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofiel

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
14
16
3
23
Beste positie
#1
#3
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.8
5.5
4.3
3.3
Laatste test
2019
2023
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
37
153
99
176

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Droog
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droog rijgedrag
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Droge behandeling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droogremmen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Rolweerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Prijs/waarde
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Soelaas
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Inwendig geluid
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store