12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Aantal tests
14
21
23
24
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.8
11.9
3.3
2.7
Laatste test
2019
2024
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
37
165
176
302

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Droog
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Droog rijgedrag
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Droge behandeling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Droogremmen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kilometrage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Rolweerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Prijs/waarde
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Soelaas
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Buitengeluid
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Inwendig geluid
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store