12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
26
10
18
6
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#3
Gemiddelde positie
4.2
6.0
6.1
4.7
Laatste test
2024
2026
2024
2026
Beschikbare maten
99
109
47
146

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Droog
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Droge behandeling
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Tractie op sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Remmen op sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Sneeuwverwerking
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Sneeuw in bochten
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Soelaas
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Soelaas
Continental AllSeasonContact
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Inwendig geluid
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolweerstand
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometrage
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Prijs/waarde
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental AllSeasonContact
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store