12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Continental
AllSeasonContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
26
16
6
3
Beste positie
#1
#3
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
4.2
5.5
4.7
3.7
Laatste test
2024
2023
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
100
153
146
36

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Natte zijgeleiding
Continental AllSeasonContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Droog
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Droog rijgedrag
Continental AllSeasonContact
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Droge stuurrespons
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Tractie op sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Remmen op sneeuw
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Sneeuwverwerking
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Sneeuw in bochten
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Soelaas
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Soelaas
Continental AllSeasonContact
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Kosten
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolweerstand
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometrage
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Prijs/waarde
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store