Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Ceat

WinterDrive

6.4

R13 – R18

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Aantal tests

4

3

4

3

24

Beste positie

#10

#4

#2

#1

Gemiddelde positie

17.0

4.3

3.3

3.7

2.7

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

37

99

40

36

302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Ceat WinterDrive

43%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Ceat WinterDrive

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Ceat WinterDrive

34%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Prestaties op nat wegdek

Ceat WinterDrive

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Sneeuw

Ceat WinterDrive

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Tractie op sneeuw

Ceat WinterDrive

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Remmen op sneeuw

Ceat WinterDrive

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Sneeuw in bochten

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Sneeuwverwerking

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

61%

Kosten

Ceat WinterDrive

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Kilometrage

Ceat WinterDrive

1%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Rolweerstand

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Droog

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Droogremmen

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Prestaties op droog wegdek

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Droge behandeling

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Soelaas

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Soelaas

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Buitengeluid

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Ijs

Ceat WinterDrive

23%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

23%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste ijsbanden Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

Ceat WinterDrive vs Ceat 4 SeasonDrive

Ceat WinterDrive vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo

Ceat WinterDrive vs Giti Gitiwinter W2

Ceat WinterDrive vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Uniroyal WinterExpert

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Kleber KRISALP HP3

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking