12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

CeatCeat

WinterDrive

6.4
R13 – R18
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Ceat
WinterDrive
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Aantal tests
4
3
4
3
Beste positie
#10
#4
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
Laatste test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Beschikbare maten
37
99
40
36

Nat

Nat
Ceat WinterDrive
43%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Ceat WinterDrive
34%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Ceat WinterDrive
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometrage
Ceat WinterDrive
1%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolweerstand
Ceat WinterDrive
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Droog

Droog
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Droogremmen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Droge behandeling
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Buitengeluid
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Ijs

Ijs
Ceat WinterDrive
23%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste sneeuwbandenBanden voor ev-auto'sBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Ceat WinterDrive vs Ceat 4 SeasonDriveCeat WinterDrive vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3Ceat WinterDrive vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evoCeat WinterDrive vs Giti Gitiwinter W2Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Uniroyal WinterExpertKumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs Kleber KRISALP HP3Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking