12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Ceat WinterDrive
CeatCeat

WinterDrive

6.4
R13 – R18
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Ceat
WinterDrive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
4
4
3
3
14
Beste positie
#10
#2
#4
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
37
40
99
36
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Ceat WinterDrive
43%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Ceat WinterDrive
34%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Ceat WinterDrive
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Ceat WinterDrive
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Ceat WinterDrive
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kosten
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kilometrage
Ceat WinterDrive
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Rolweerstand
Ceat WinterDrive
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Prijs/waarde
Ceat WinterDrive
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Droog
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Droge behandeling
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Buitengeluid
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Ijs
Ceat WinterDrive
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste winterbanden voor sneeuwBeste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Ceat WinterDrive vs Ceat 4 SeasonDriveCeat WinterDrive vs GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evoCeat WinterDrive vs Giti Gitiwinter W2Ceat WinterDrive vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store