12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
1
18
14
5
4
Beste positie
#3
#1
#8
#1
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
6.1
13.4
2.8
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
10
47
153
139
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Droog
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store