12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Ceat WinterDrive SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

Ceat
WinterDrive SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Aantal tests
1
18
14
4
5
Beste positie
#3
#1
#8
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.0
6.1
13.4
3.3
2.8
Laatste test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
10
47
153
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Sneeuw
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
95%
Droog
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Droogremmen
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Droge behandeling
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Buitengeluid
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Soelaas
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolweerstand
Ceat WinterDrive SUV
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store