12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofiel

Ceat
4 SeasonDrive
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Aantal tests
4
4
17
14
Beste positie
#5
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
17.0
3.3
1.7
3.6
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
34
40
80
194

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Sneeuw
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuw in bochten
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Sneeuwverwerking
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kosten
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Prijs/waarde
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolweerstand
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometrage
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Soelaas
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Buitengeluid
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Soelaas
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Droog
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Droogremmen
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Droge behandeling
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store