12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Turanza T001
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Aantal tests
12
3
10
Beste positie
#2
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
6.8
3.3
6.0
Laatste test
2017
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
111
40
104

Nat

Nat
Bridgestone Turanza T001
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Turanza T001
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Turanza T001
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Turanza T001
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Turanza T001
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Turanza T001
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Turanza T001
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Turanza T001
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Turanza T001
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Inwendig geluid
Bridgestone Turanza T001
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Droog

Droog
Bridgestone Turanza T001
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking