Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-005

Winter Sport 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip 9+

Aantal tests

49

48

17

7

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

3.2

4.9

1.7

4.7

Laatste test

2024

2025

2022

Beschikbare maten

213

189

80

36

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

79%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

80%

GoodYear

UltraGrip 9+

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

63%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

81%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

88%

Aquaplaning longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

79%

Aquaplaning transversaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

90%

Droge prestaties

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

67%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

80%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

63%

GoodYear

UltraGrip 9+

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

63%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

71%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

55%

Sneeuwprestaties

93%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

79%

GoodYear

UltraGrip 9+

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

90%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

79%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

73%

Bochten op sneeuw in cirkel

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

75%

Comfort & geluid

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

70%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

75%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

84%

GoodYear

UltraGrip 9+

Exterieurgeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

78%

Rijcomfort

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

90%

Economie

64%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

64%

Dunlop

Winter Sport 5

89%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

76%

GoodYear

UltraGrip 9+

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

73%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

55%

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

55%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

79%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Organisatie	Seizoen	Jaar	Maat
Autobild	Winter	2021	205/55 R16	Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+

Blizzak LM-005

Winter Sport 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip 9+

Test profile

Prestatievergelijking

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking