Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Budget

Matador

MP92 Sibir Snow

R15 – R18

Bovenmidden

Hankook

W462 Winter i*cept RS3

8.1

R14 – R17

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

MP92 Sibir Snow

W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Aantal tests

15

8

14

Best position

#4

#12

#2

Average position

7.9

22.3

5.5

Laatste test

2018

2021

2025

Beschikbare maten

132

43

78

Nat

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

72%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

92%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

84%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

65%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

88%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

79%

Droog

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

74%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

85%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

74%

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

70%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

74%

Prijs/waarde

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

87%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

73%

Sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

83%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

82%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

78%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

75%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

81%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

68%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

77%

Buitengeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

81%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

65%

Inwendig geluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

60%

Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

84%

Ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Matador MP92 Sibir Snow

79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Blizzak LM-001

MP92 Sibir Snow

W462 Winter i*cept RS3

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking