Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

WinterCraft WP71

R16 – R19

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Winter

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP71

UltraGrip Performance 3

Aantal tests

15

11

24

Best position

#4

#6

#1

Average position

7.9

12.5

2.7

Laatste test

2018

2020

2025

Beschikbare maten

132

57

302

Nat

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Natte prestaties

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Droog

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Droge prestaties

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Prijs/waarde

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Buitengeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Inwendig geluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP71

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking