Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Premie

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofiel

Blizzak LM-001

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Aantal tests

15

23

3

Beste positie

#4

#1

#4

Gemiddelde positie

7.9

3.3

4.3

Laatste test

2018

2025

Beschikbare maten

132

176

97

Nat

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Droog

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Prijs/waarde

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Buitengeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Inwendig geluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-001

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Kosten

Sneeuw

Soelaas

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking