12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Dunlop
Winter Sport 5
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Aantal tests
15
48
29
3
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#4
Average position
7.9
4.9
3.7
4.3
Laatste test
2018
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
132
189
178
97

Nat

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
62%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Natte prestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
81%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Droog

Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Droge prestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Droog rijgedrag
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Brandstofefficiëntie
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Prijs/waarde
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
70%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
88%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
77%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
50%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
75%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Inwendig geluid
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Ijs

Ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
77%
Remmen op ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
69%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking