Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

VS

Budget

Barum

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

Snowtrac 5

Winterhawk 3

UltraGrip Performance+

Aantal tests

15

10

19

12

14

23

Best position

#4

#3

#4

#3

#1

Average position

7.9

10.6

11.2

12.6

16.0

3.3

Laatste test

2018

2021

2019

2020

2025

Beschikbare maten

132

67

76

57

66

176

Nat

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Barum Polaris 3

74%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

70%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

71%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

57%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

69%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Barum Polaris 3

65%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

73%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Droog

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Barum Polaris 3

71%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Droog rijgedrag

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

78%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

89%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Droge prestaties

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

82%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

79%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

89%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

84%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Barum Polaris 3

87%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

85%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

75%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Prijs/waarde

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Barum Polaris 3

81%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Barum Polaris 3

84%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Barum Polaris 3

68%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

65%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Brandstofefficiëntie

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

88%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

66%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Buitengeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Barum Polaris 3

79%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

61%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Inwendig geluid

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

67%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

81%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Remmen op ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

83%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

80%

Firestone Winterhawk 3

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-001

Polaris 3

MS plus 77

Snowtrac 5

Winterhawk 3

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Nat

Droog

Sneeuw

Kosten

Soelaas

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking