Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premie

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

VS

Vergelijk ook met

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

14

3

23

3

Beste positie

#1

#4

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

3.6

4.3

3.3

3.7

Laatste test

2025

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

188

97

40

176

34

Nat

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Remmen op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Natte prestaties

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Tractie op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Remmen op sneeuw

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuwverwerking

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Sneeuw in bochten

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Droog

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Droge behandeling

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Droge prestaties

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Droge stuurrespons

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Kosten

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometrage

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Prijs/waarde

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Soelaas

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Inwendig geluid

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Offroad

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Ijs

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Sneeuw

Droog

Kosten

Soelaas

Offroad

Ijs

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking