12 winkels · 123.162+ producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremie
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Bovenmidden
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
14
10
4
6
4
Beste positie
#1
#2
#3
#3
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
6.0
12.0
4.7
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
194
109
111
146
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Droge stuurrespons
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Beste winterbanden voor sneeuwBeste banden voor elektrische voertuigenBeste ijsbandenBeste droge behandeling bandenBeste regenbandenStilste bandenMeest zuinige bandenBeste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro+Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PBridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Bladeren op merk

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store