12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premie
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Vergelijk ook met
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
14
10
3
26
Beste positie
#1
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
6.0
3.3
2.2
Laatste test
2025
2026
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
188
104
40
66

Nat

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Natte prestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Droog

Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge prestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Droge stuurrespons
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Prijs/waarde
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Inwendig geluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking