12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
14
10
3
18
Beste positie
#1
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
6.0
1.3
6.1
Laatste test
2025
2026
2026
2024
Beschikbare maten
194
109
23
47

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Natte zijgeleiding
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Droge stuurrespons
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Prijs/waarde
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store