12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten
BANDENLAB.BE

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premie
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexBovenmidden
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Bovenmidden
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premie
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Vergelijk ook met
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Aantal tests
14
3
3
23
Beste positie
#1
#2
#4
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
3.7
4.3
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Beschikbare maten
188
34
97
176

Nat

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Sneeuw

Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Sneeuw in bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Sneeuwprestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Droog

Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Droge prestaties
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Droge stuurrespons
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Prijs/waarde
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Inwendig geluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Offroad

Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Ijs

Ijs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking