12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Aantal tests
14
1
10
4
Beste positie
#1
#7
#2
#2
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
7.0
6.0
3.3
Laatste test
2025
2023
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
194
88
109
40

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Prestaties op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Inwendig geluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store