12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Testprofiel

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Aantal tests
14
1
10
18
Beste positie
#1
#7
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
3.6
7.0
6.0
6.1
Laatste test
2025
2023
2026
2024
Beschikbare maten
194
88
109
47

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Remmen op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Tractie op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Remmen op sneeuw
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Sneeuwverwerking
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Sneeuw in bochten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Droog
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Droogremmen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Droge behandeling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rolweerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kilometrage
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Prijs/waarde
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Buitengeluid
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Soelaas
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ijs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store