12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Aantal tests
14
4
3
2
28
Beste positie
#8
#2
#2
#1
#1
Gemiddelde positie
13.4
3.3
3.7
2.0
2.3
Laatste test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
40
36
48
67

Nat

Nat
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Natte zijgeleiding
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Droog

Droog
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Prestaties op droog wegdek
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Droge stuurrespons
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Prijs/waarde
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store