Vergelijking: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

BFGoodrich

Advantage

VS

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofiel

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

14

16

3

1

3

Beste positie

#8

#3

#2

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

13.4

5.5

3.7

1.0

3.7

Laatste test

2026

2023

2025

Beschikbare maten

153

34

64

34

Nat

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Remmen op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Natte zijgeleiding

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Droog

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Droge behandeling

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Droge rijstrook wisselen

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Droge stuurrespons

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Soelaas

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Soelaas

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kosten

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolweerstand

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kilometrage

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Prijs/waarde

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Advantage

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Nat

Droog

Soelaas

Kosten

Afmetingen en prijzen

Voeg toe aan vergelijking