12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofiel

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Aantal tests
14
6
4
3
3
Beste positie
#8
#3
#2
#2
#1
Gemiddelde positie
13.4
4.7
3.3
3.7
1.3
Laatste test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
153
146
40
36
23

Deze banden zijn niet samen in dezelfde test beoordeeld. de onderstaande scores zijn samengesteld uit verschillende onafhankelijke tests, dus directe vergelijking dient met voorzichtigheid te worden geïnterpreteerd.

Nat
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Natte zijgeleiding
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Droog
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Droge behandeling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Droge rijstrook wisselen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Soelaas
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolweerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

DOWNLOAD

Bandenlab.be

Gratis — in de App Store

Vergelijk banden, lees testresultaten en vind de beste prijzen — alles in één app.

Bekijk in de App Store