12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
1
4
28
6
Beste positie
#13
#3
#1
#3
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
12.0
2.3
4.7
Laatste test
2019
2025
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
15
111
67
146

Nat

Nat
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Droog

Droog
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking