Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Bovenmidden

Kumho

Vergelijk ook met

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofiel

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

1

5

18

3

Beste positie

#13

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

13.0

4.4

6.1

3.7

Laatste test

2019

2026

2024

2025

Beschikbare maten

15

99

47

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Remmen op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Droog

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Soelaas

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometrage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste ijsbanden Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Vergelijk ook

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Continental VanContact Winter

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Roadhawk 2

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Firestone Firehawk Sport

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking