Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Bovenmidden

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premie

Continental

Vergelijk ook met

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofiel

ACTIVAN WINTER

SportContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Aantal tests

1

16

4

3

Beste positie

#13

#1

#2

Gemiddelde positie

13.0

1.2

3.3

3.7

Laatste test

2019

2026

2025

Beschikbare maten

15

124

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nat

Continental SportContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Remmen op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Continental SportContact 7

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Behandeling op nat wegdek

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - kruisen

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudinaal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Droog

Continental SportContact 7

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Droogremmen

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Continental SportContact 7

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Soelaas

Continental SportContact 7

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Buitengeluid

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Kosten

Continental SportContact 7

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Kilometrage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Ranglijsten verkennen

Best snow tyres Best tyres for evs Beste ijsbanden Beste droge behandeling banden Beste regenbanden Stilste banden Meest zuinige banden Beste anti-aquaplaning banden

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Vergelijk ook

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Continental VanContact Winter

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Michelin AGILIS ALPIN

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs Vredestein Comtrac 2 Winter

Continental SportContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo

Continental SportContact 7 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental SportContact 7 vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Bladeren op merk

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

ACTIVAN WINTER

SportContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofiel

Afmetingen en prijzen

Ranglijsten verkennen

Populaire bandenvergelijkingen

Vergelijk ook

Bladeren op merk

Voeg toe aan vergelijking