12 winkels · 123.162+ producten

Vergelijking: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
1
28
4
6
Beste positie
#13
#1
#3
#3
Gemiddelde positie
13.0
2.3
12.0
4.7
Laatste test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Beschikbare maten
15
67
111
146

Nat

Nat
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Remmen op nat wegdek
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Droog

Droog
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droogremmen
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Soelaas

Soelaas
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking