12 Winkels · 123,162+ Producten

Vergelijking: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofiel

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Aantal tests
6
3
6
Beste positie
#6
#2
#3
Gemiddelde positie
19.3
3.3
4.7
Laatste test
2019
2026
2026
Beschikbare maten
2
40
146

Nat

Nat
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - kruisen
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudinaal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Kosten

Kosten
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometrage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolweerstand
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Soelaas

Soelaas
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Buitengeluid
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Droog

Droog
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Droge behandeling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking