12 Shops · 123,162+ Products

Vergelijking: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Aantal tests
5
19
14
15
Best position
#7
#3
#3
#4
Average position
15.8
11.2
16.0
7.9
Laatste test
2019
2021
2020
2018
Beschikbare maten
13
76
66
132

Prestatievergelijking

Natte prestaties
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Remmen op nat wegdek
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
63%
Behandeling op nat wegdek
Uniroyal MS plus 77
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
69%
Natte cirkelbochten in de bochten
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Aquaplaning longitudinaal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
Aquaplaning transversaal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
89%
Droge prestaties
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
72%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
72%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Droogremmen
Firestone Winterhawk 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
72%
Sneeuwprestaties
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Remmen op sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
69%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Tractie op sneeuw
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Sneeuwverwerking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Prestaties op ijs
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
89%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Remmen op ijs met abs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
82%
Zijdelingse geleiding van het ijs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Comfort & geluid
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
69%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
56%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Exterieurgeluid
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Interieurgeluid
Uniroyal MS plus 77
60%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
33%
Economie
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
BF
Goodrich g-force Winter
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Brandstofefficiëntie
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
79%
Kilometrage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
64%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
76%

Tests gebruikt in vergelijking

OrganisatieSeizoenJaarMaat
ADACADAC
Winter
2016225/45 R17Bekijk

Afmetingen en prijzen

Vergelijk prijzen voor alle beschikbare maten van deze banden.

Bekijk algemene vergelijking

Voeg toe aan vergelijking

Populaire merken
Nieuwe vergelijking